Rail intermodal
27.4 mi
29.2 mi by road · 37 min
Charles P. Howard Terminal
MOBILE MINI INC
44580 OLD WARM SPRINGS BLVD, FREMONT, CA 94538
FRS 110071758366
Location Snapshot
BTS NTAD (Aug 2026)Port area center
14.6 mi
21 mi by road · 34 min
Redwood City, CA
Cargo airport
21 mi
24.1 mi by road · 32 min
OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO BAY (OAK)
Straight-line distance to nearest published freight feature; drive time is by car, not a truck route. Context · not part of the assessment.
Show transport table (nearest per type + all published destinations)
Transport access
Context · not part of the assessment
Distance from this facility’s reviewed coordinate to the nearest official freight destinations. Estimated driving route (OpenStreetMap) on the public road network for a car profile — not a truck route.
| Class | Destination | Straight-line mi | By road mi | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport · statistical-area centroid | Redwood City, CACoastal · USACE rank 137 · 1,431,714 short tons total | 15 | 21 | 34 min |
| Seaport · statistical-area centroid | Port of Oakland, CACoastal · USACE rank 35 · 16,362,201 short tons total | 23 | 26 | 35 min |
| Seaport · statistical-area centroid | San Francisco Port, CACoastal · USACE rank 143 · 1,190,181 short tons total | 33 | 42 | 57 min |
| Marine terminal · dock-level point | Port of Oakland · Charles P. Howard TerminalPort of Oakland Commission · BNSF, UP via OTR | 27 | 29 | 37 min |
| Marine terminal · dock-level point | Port of Oakland · Matson TerminalStevedoring Services of America Terminals, Inc (SSA-Oakland) · BNSF, UP via OTR | 28 | 30 | 43 min |
| Rail intermodal | Charles P. Howard TerminalBNSF, UP via OTR · TOFC/COFC · Port of Oakland | 27 | 29 | 37 min |
| Rail intermodal | Matson TerminalBNSF, UP via OTR · TOFC/COFC · Port of Oakland | 28 | 30 | 43 min |
| Rail intermodal | Railport OaklandUP · TOFC/COFC · Port of Oakland | 28 | 30 | 39 min |
| Air cargo | OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO BAY (OAK)8 air-to-truck facilities · Federal Express; Southwest Airlines; United Parcel Service; DHL Airlines · vintage 07/2018 | 21 | 24 | 32 min |
| Air cargo | SAN FRANCISCO INTL (SFO)7 air-to-truck facilities · American Airlines; Alaska Airlines; All Nippon Airways; Lufthansa German Airlines; Taca International Airlines Cargo; United Air Lines; Southwest Airlines … · vintage 09/2018 | 26 | 37 | 46 min |
| Air cargo | SALT LAKE CITY INTL (SLC)1 air-to-truck facility · Alaska Airlines; Federal Express; Southwest Airlines · vintage 09/2018 | 84 | 109 | 2 h 11 min |
Sources: U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Atlas Database (Principal Ports, Intermodal Freight Facilities Rail TOFC/COFC, Air-to-Truck, Marine Ro-Ro), public domain. By-road routing © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), routing by OSRM; Estimated driving route (OpenStreetMap), not HOS, permit, weight, or hazmat aware. USACE principal-port polygons are tonnage-statistics areas, not dock footprints; the marine-terminal row is the dock-level point. Air-to-truck facilities reflect the dataset’s stated vintage. Straight-line and by-road figures describe proximity to an official source feature only; they do not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, or that this facility uses any listed destination.
Source details (one block per source)
BTS NTAD · data Aug 2026 · retrieved Aug 18, 2026. Straight-line distances do not establish route access, gate hours, truck restrictions, service or capacity.
Full caveat & source details
Port area center
Redwood City, CA · 14.6 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) freight destination layers are national-scale reference points and may not be appropriate for local-scale mapping. Straight-line proximity to a source feature does not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, availability, or facility use of that destination. Distance is to the mapped port-area center, not a dock or terminal.
Cargo airport
OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO BAY (OAK) · 21 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) freight destination layers are national-scale reference points and may not be appropriate for local-scale mapping. Straight-line proximity to a source feature does not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, availability, or facility use of that destination.
Rail intermodal
Charles P. Howard Terminal · 27.4 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) freight destination layers are national-scale reference points and may not be appropriate for local-scale mapping. Straight-line proximity to a source feature does not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, availability, or facility use of that destination.
Power, flood & wildfire · public context
Public location context, not part of the risk assessment.
Power outages
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Annual interruption minutes per customer: 272.6
Annual interruptions per customer: 1.63
- Source
- eia-reliability
- Source date
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-08
- Geography
- County utility candidate: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- Method
- EIA-861 utility-system reliability measures using the published facility-to-utility match.
- What this does not establish
- County-level utility candidate only; the facility provider remains unknown. U.S. EIA Form EIA-861, reporting year 2025. County-level utility candidate selected by largest reported utility-state customer count, not a confirmed serving provider. Utility-state annual reliability context, not facility outage history or feeder/circuit/substation evidence. Context only; not part of the risk assessment. Multiple county utility candidates remain possible; original 2024 candidate observations are retained in the research backup.
Flood
Modeled events per year: 2.25
Published events: 63
Impacted area: 166.6 sq mi
FEMA NRI county-level modeled flood context; it does not describe this facility's flood zone or predict a facility loss.
- Source date
- December 2025 (1.20.0)
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-01T00:20:00+00:00
- Geography
- county modeled planning context
- Method
- exact_county_fips
- What this does not establish
- This product uses the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Risk Index dataset API or downloadable datasets but is not endorsed by FEMA. The Federal Government or FEMA cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from the Agency's website(s).
Wildfire
No published information is currently available for this location.
Pro
Detailed evidence for this facility
- Employee safety records (OSHA)Pro
- Environmental records (EPA)Pro
- FDA recordsPro
- Federal exclusions (SAM)Pro
- Reported property offensesPro
- Detailed climate historyPro
- Detailed source receiptsPro
- ComparisonsPro
- ExportsPro
- MonitoringPro
- Facility visualsPro
Locks mark Pro content and tools—not a claim that a record exists for this facility.
Checking Pro access…
Request a profile correction
Provide a source link and explain what should be reviewed, including operator changes, closures, or a requested removal. Requests are moderated and never change or remove a profile automatically.