Rail intermodal
43.1 mi
51.3 mi by road · 59 min
Omaha, NE
GXO Logistics — Lincoln
Operator: GXO Logistics
6245 Cloud Ct, Lincoln, NE 68514
Location Snapshot
BTS NTAD (Aug 2026)Port
280.4 mi
351.6 mi by road · 399 min
Heartland Port Authority, MO
Cargo airport
7.1 mi
8.5 mi by road · 12 min
LINCOLN
Straight-line distance to nearest published freight feature; drive time is by car, not a truck route. Context · not part of the assessment.
Show transport table (nearest per type + all published destinations)
Transport access
Context · not part of the assessment
Distance from this facility’s reviewed coordinate to the nearest official freight destinations. By-road is the shortest drivable route on the public road network for a car profile — not a truck route.
| Class | Destination | Straight-line mi | By road mi | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport · USACE statistical area | Heartland Port Authority, MO | 280 | 352 | 6 h 39 min |
| Rail intermodal | Omaha, NE | 43 | 51 | 59 min |
| Air cargo | LINCOLN | 7.1 | 8.5 | 12 min |
Sources: U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Atlas Database (Principal Ports, Intermodal Freight Facilities Rail TOFC/COFC, Air-to-Truck, Marine Ro-Ro), public domain. By-road routing © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), routing by OSRM; shortest drivable route, not HOS, permit, weight, or hazmat aware. Air-to-truck facilities reflect the dataset’s stated vintage. Straight-line and by-road figures describe proximity to an official source feature only; they do not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, or that this facility uses any listed destination.
Source details (one block per source)
BTS NTAD · data Aug 2026 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026. Straight-line distances do not establish route access, gate hours, truck restrictions, service or capacity.
Full caveat & source details
Cargo airport
LINCOLN · 7.1 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Rail intermodal
Omaha, NE · 43.1 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Principal port
Heartland Port Authority, MO · 280.4 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Power, flood & wildfire · public context
Public location context, not part of the risk assessment.
Power outages
Omaha Public Power District
Annual interruption minutes per customer: 558.3
Annual interruptions per customer: 1.57
- Source
- eia-reliability
- Source date
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-08
- Geography
- County utility candidate: Omaha Public Power District
- Method
- EIA-861 utility-system reliability measures using the published facility-to-utility match.
- What this does not establish
- County-level utility candidate only; the facility provider remains unknown. U.S. EIA Form EIA-861, reporting year 2025. County-level utility candidate selected by largest reported utility-state customer count, not a confirmed serving provider. Utility-state annual reliability context, not facility outage history or feeder/circuit/substation evidence. Context only; not part of the risk assessment. Multiple county utility candidates remain possible; county candidate observations are retained in the research backup.
Flood
Modeled events per year: 1.43
Published events: 40
Impacted area: 115.3 sq mi
FEMA NRI county-level modeled flood context; it does not describe this facility's flood zone or predict a facility loss.
- Source date
- December 2025 (1.20.0)
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-11T09:48:33.050848+00:00
- Geography
- county modeled planning context
- Method
- exact_county_fips
- What this does not establish
- This product uses the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Risk Index dataset API or downloadable datasets but is not endorsed by FEMA. The Federal Government or FEMA cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from the Agency's website(s).
Wildfire
Wildfire likelihood percentile: 54.4
USDA Wildfire Risk to Communities reports modeled county-level wildfire context for Lancaster County, NE. USDA Forest Service Wildfire Risk to Communities values are modeled relative area context. They are not a parcel inspection, forecast, insurance determination, facility loss estimate, or replacement for localized assessment. RPS assumes generalized structure susceptibility and should be considered a landscape metric, not a measurement of any specific building.
- Source
- usfs-wrc-2
- Source date
- WRC-2026-04-15-county-association-global42686-supported-b4-17
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-26T05:09:56.663914+00:00
- Geography
- Lancaster County, NE
- Method
- exact_county_area_context
- What this does not establish
- USDA Forest Service Wildfire Risk to Communities values are modeled relative area context. They are not a parcel inspection, forecast, insurance determination, facility loss estimate, or replacement for localized assessment. RPS assumes generalized structure susceptibility and should be considered a landscape metric, not a measurement of any specific building.
Pro
Detailed evidence for this facility
- Employee safety records (OSHA)Pro
- Environmental records (EPA)Pro
- FDA recordsPro
- Federal exclusions (SAM)Pro
- Reported property offensesPro
- Detailed climate historyPro
- Detailed source receiptsPro
- ComparisonsPro
- ExportsPro
- MonitoringPro
- Facility visualsPro
Locks mark Pro content and tools—not a claim that a record exists for this facility.
Checking Pro access…
Request a profile correction
Provide a source link and explain what should be reviewed, including operator changes, closures, or a requested removal. Requests are moderated and never change or remove a profile automatically.