Rail intermodal
80.8 mi
96.7 mi by road · 129 min
Container Terminal (South Gate)
DSV — Kinston
Operator: DSV
2101 John Mewborne, Kinston, NC 28504
Location Snapshot
BTS NTAD (Aug 2026)Port
64.8 mi
76.4 mi by road · 102 min
Morehead City, NC
Cargo airport
24.8 mi
34.6 mi by road · 44 min
PITT-GREENVILLE
Straight-line distance to nearest published freight feature; drive time is by car, not a truck route. Context · not part of the assessment.
Show transport table (nearest per type + all published destinations)
Transport access
Context · not part of the assessment
Distance from this facility’s reviewed coordinate to the nearest official freight destinations. By-road is the shortest drivable route on the public road network for a car profile — not a truck route.
| Class | Destination | Straight-line mi | By road mi | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport · USACE statistical area | Morehead City, NC | 65 | 76 | 1 h 42 min |
| Rail intermodal | Container Terminal (South Gate) | 81 | 97 | 2 h 9 min |
| Air cargo | PITT-GREENVILLE | 25 | 35 | 44 min |
Sources: U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Atlas Database (Principal Ports, Intermodal Freight Facilities Rail TOFC/COFC, Air-to-Truck, Marine Ro-Ro), public domain. By-road routing © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), routing by OSRM; shortest drivable route, not HOS, permit, weight, or hazmat aware. Air-to-truck facilities reflect the dataset’s stated vintage. Straight-line and by-road figures describe proximity to an official source feature only; they do not establish route access, legal ingress, gate hours, truck restrictions, service, capacity, or that this facility uses any listed destination.
Source details (one block per source)
BTS NTAD · data Aug 2026 · retrieved Sep 7, 2026. Straight-line distances do not establish route access, gate hours, truck restrictions, service or capacity.
Full caveat & source details
Cargo airport
PITT-GREENVILLE · 24.8 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Principal port
Morehead City, NC · 64.8 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Rail intermodal
Container Terminal (South Gate) · 80.8 mi straight-line
- Source
- bts-ntad
- Source date
- ntad-2026-08
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00+00:00
- Geography
- Mapped facility coordinate to the nearest published network feature
- Method
- Straight-line distance. By-road transport details are shown separately when published.
- What this does not establish
- U.S. DOT BTS NTAD freight destination layers are national-scale reference points. Straight-line or via-road proximity does not establish route access, legal ingress, service, capacity, or facility use.
Power, flood & wildfire · public context
Public location context, not part of the risk assessment.
Power outages
Duke Energy Progress - (NC)
Annual interruption minutes per customer: 183.2
Annual interruptions per customer: 1.41
- Source
- eia-reliability
- Source date
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-08
- Geography
- County utility candidate: Duke Energy Progress - (NC)
- Method
- EIA-861 utility-system reliability measures using the published facility-to-utility match.
- What this does not establish
- County-level utility candidate only; the facility provider remains unknown. U.S. EIA Form EIA-861, reporting year 2025. County-level utility candidate selected by largest reported utility-state customer count, not a confirmed serving provider. Utility-state annual reliability context, not facility outage history or feeder/circuit/substation evidence. Context only; not part of the risk assessment. Multiple county utility candidates remain possible; county candidate observations are retained in the research backup.
Flood
No published information is currently available for this location.
Wildfire
No published information is currently available for this location.
Pro
Detailed evidence for this facility
- Employee safety records (OSHA)Pro
- Environmental records (EPA)Pro
- FDA recordsPro
- Federal exclusions (SAM)Pro
- Reported property offensesPro
- Detailed climate historyPro
- Detailed source receiptsPro
- ComparisonsPro
- ExportsPro
- MonitoringPro
- Facility visualsPro
Locks mark Pro content and tools—not a claim that a record exists for this facility.
Checking Pro access…
Request a profile correction
Provide a source link and explain what should be reviewed, including operator changes, closures, or a requested removal. Requests are moderated and never change or remove a profile automatically.